Introduction to PKCE
Proof Key for Code Exchange (PKCE, pronounced "pixie") is a crucial security extension to the OAuth 2.0 authorization code flow. Originally designed to secure OAuth flows in mobile applications, PKCE has become a best practice for all OAuth clients, including single-page applications and even confidential clients.
The Security Problem PKCE Solves
Traditional OAuth 2.0 authorization code flow has a vulnerability window where authorization codes can be intercepted. This is particularly problematic in:
- Mobile applications using custom URL schemes
- Single-page applications without secure backend storage
- Public clients that cannot securely store client secrets
- Environments where authorization codes might be logged or cached
How PKCE Works
PKCE adds an extra layer of security by introducing a dynamically generated secret that proves the client initiating the authorization request is the same client exchanging the authorization code for tokens.
The PKCE Flow:
- Code Verifier Generation: Client generates a cryptographically random string (43-128 characters)
- Code Challenge Creation: Client creates SHA256 hash of the code verifier and base64url-encodes it
- Authorization Request: Client includes the code challenge in the authorization request
- Code Exchange: Client sends the original code verifier when exchanging the authorization code
- Verification: Authorization server verifies the code verifier matches the original challenge
Technical Implementation
The PKCE specification (RFC 7636) defines specific requirements for implementation:
Code Verifier Requirements:
- Length: 43-128 characters
- Character set: A-Z, a-z, 0-9, -, ., _, ~ (unreserved characters)
- High entropy for security (recommended: 256 bits)
Code Challenge Methods:
- S256: SHA256 hash of code verifier, base64url-encoded (recommended)
- plain: Code verifier used directly (only for testing, not recommended)
Benefits of Using PKCE
Implementing PKCE provides several security advantages:
- Authorization Code Protection: Even if intercepted, authorization codes are useless without the code verifier
- No Client Secret Required: Perfect for public clients that cannot securely store secrets
- Dynamic Security: Each authorization flow uses a unique code verifier/challenge pair
- Backward Compatibility: Can be implemented alongside existing OAuth flows
- Industry Standard: Recommended by OAuth 2.0 Security Best Practices
Best Practices for PKCE Implementation
- Always use the S256 code challenge method
- Generate code verifiers with sufficient entropy (256 bits minimum)
- Store code verifiers securely in client application memory
- Never log or persist code verifiers
- Implement proper error handling for PKCE validation failures
- Use PKCE even for confidential clients as an additional security layer
Common PKCE Implementation Mistakes
Avoid these common pitfalls when implementing PKCE:
- Using insufficient entropy in code verifier generation
- Storing code verifiers in insecure locations
- Using the 'plain' code challenge method in production
- Not validating code verifier format requirements
- Reusing code verifiers across multiple authorization attempts
PKCE and Modern OAuth 2.0
PKCE has evolved from a mobile-specific security enhancement to a fundamental part of modern OAuth 2.0 implementations. The OAuth 2.1 specification makes PKCE mandatory for all clients, reflecting its importance in the current security landscape.
Whether you're building a mobile app, single-page application, or server-side web application, implementing PKCE is now considered essential for maintaining the security and integrity of your OAuth 2.0 flows.